Send Story to a Friend



Referendum on Torture: Debate Over Role of Psychologists in Military Interrogations Comes to a Head at APA Annual Convention

Referendum on Torture: Debate Over Role of Psychologists in Military Interrogations Comes to a Head at APA Annual Convention

The debate over the role that psychologists should play in military interrogations heated up this weekend at the annual convention of the American Psychological Association. After years of back-and-forth discussion and several resignations from the association, APA members are now voting on a referendum that could make any participation in coercive prisoner interrogations a violation of their code of ethics. Meanwhile, California became the first state in the nation to officially condemn the participation of health professionals—including psychologists—in coercive interrogations of prisoners in the so-called war on terror. [includes rush transcript]

Send this story to a friend
Your name:
Your email:
Friend's email:

Paste up to 10 friends' email addresses, separated by commas.
Message:
 
 
hint: if you can't read these two words, click the speaker icon
(the middle red button) to hear them; click it twice to try again.